Part 10 of 14, How

When Should You Link Notes? (And When You Definitely Shouldn't)

4 min read

From the book: Part 2 — Connecting ideas (also: Part 2 — Connecting ideas / When to link notes / When not to link notes; Part 5 — How do you find the right notes to link to?)

Linking is what turns a folder of notes into a network of ideas. It's the bit people get most excited about, usually after seeing a graph view of dots and lines.

But I see two opposite mistakes. People who don't link at all, so their notes stay as islands. And people who link everything, so their notes turn into noise.

How do you find the middle?

Why linking matters

The brain stores information as a web. If I say "Apple", you think of Steve Jobs, the iPhone, the App Store, the MacBook. Memories are associated with other memories, and association is what helps us recall.

Your notes can work the same way. Understanding doesn't just live in a single note. It also lives in how your notes connect.

A simple test

When I'm deciding whether to add a link, I imagine myself in six months. I've forgotten the detail, and I'm rediscovering this note with fresh eyes. What would be useful to look at next?

If a link would help future me, I add it. If it wouldn't, I leave it out. Here are the situations where I most often say yes.

1. When the note assumes you know something

Notes should be understandable on their own, but sometimes a note rests on a prior concept or source. A note summarising the results of a peer-reviewed study is an example. Link to the study itself and you've given context for what it set out to discover and how.

2. When it sparks lateral thinking

This is my favourite. Imagine you're writing about how DNA mutates. While writing, your mind wanders. DNA is a medium that holds information. Stories also hold information. Stories get passed down from generation to generation and change subtly along the way. They mutate.

That's the moment to capture a new note, "Mutations within storytelling", and link it back to your DNA note. And now the questions start. Do stories mutate through errors in retelling, or because people deliberately change them, like a child inheriting traits from two parents?

You didn't plan that insight. It appeared because you gave yourself a lightweight way to follow a thought.

3. When you want to test an idea somewhere else

You've noted that a young child can remember an emotional experience but not the reason behind it. Does that apply to pets? To colleagues? To machine learning algorithms? Jot the questions down in a note and link back.

4. When a thought pops into your head

Capture it as a quick note and link back to what sparked it. Then, and this part is important, return to what you were doing. Try not to chase every rabbit hole in the moment.

Don't keep linking to a core concept. It's tempting to link to your "Growth Mindset" note every time you mention growth mindset. Don't. It makes noise. Create a Map of Content for the topic and link everything from there. Your software's backlinks will show you which maps a note belongs to.

Don't automate it. Tools that auto-link notes by keyword can be out of context ("working memory" means something very different in computing and in learning). And there's a bigger reason: it skips your own thinking. You hand the job of connecting ideas to a machine, and you end up less aware of what's in your system. A lot of your best insights happen on a walk or doing the dishes, but only if you've paid attention to the notes in the first place.

Quick rule of thumb

Link when the connection would help future you think. Skip it when it would only help future you scroll.

There's an even more powerful kind of link

When two notes spark a brand-new idea together, you can capture it in a note of its own that sits between them. It's how original thinking starts to emerge from your notes. In Atomic Note-Taking I cover these intermediary notes, the two styles of link (conversational vs archivist), bi-directional links and how to use them, with real examples.

Atomic Note-Taking book cover: a young reader reaches for a flying page amid swirling pages and golden light.

Atomic Note-Taking

Go deeper with Atomic Note-Taking

In the book:

  • Intermediary notes, conversational vs archivist links, bi-directional links

From $9.99

30-day refund — email us within 30 days and we'll refund you.

Refund policy

  • If the book or course is not for you, email hello@atomicworkflows.com within 30 days of buying and we will refund you.
  • Send it from the address you used at checkout, or quote the order number on your receipt.
  • Lemon Squeezy, our merchant of record, pays the refund back to the card or payment method you used.
  • Once refunded, the licence key stops working and the product leaves your library.
  • This is in addition to your statutory rights as a consumer.

Enjoyed this? Get the next one by email

New posts from the series and new guides, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe any time.